COMPLEX SYSTEM OF ECOLOGICAL CONTROL FOR BUSINESS OBJECTS TECHNOLOGICAL SAFETY OF PETROL STATION AS EXAMPLE
Kozulia Tatiana
National Technical University “Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute”, Kharkiv, Ukraine
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5107-9140
Korshunov Svjatoslav
National Technical University “Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute”, Kharkiv, Ukraine
DOI: 10.52363/2522-1892.2024.1.3
Keywords: technological ecological safety, technological danger control, complex research systemology, system modelling, complex ecological estimation, quality estimation scale, information support, ecological quality control program
Abstract
The paper provides implementation results of complex ecological control for safety level at technological objects based on European approach which is in fact environmental influence estimation (EIE). Environmental influence estimation system (EIES) has normative approach and is restrictive, so it doesn’t prevent technological pollution of environment. EIES standards are created according to zero human health risk concept, but real insignificant exceedings of critical concentrations are potentially dangerous for ecosystems. «Zero risk» concept doesn’t ensure ecological economy growth, as it is based upon risk analysis principle of «costs-benefits». It narrows application of sustainable development statements and Ecostrategy-2019, which require ecological natural resources usage, anthropogenic environment influence decrease, ecological activity effectiveness parameters increase.
The paper proposes EIE system approach implementation due to complex achieving of economical objects sustainable ecological development. Systemology was examined as base for heterogeneous objects information models creation during interdisciplinary problem solving of complex «object-environment» systems research.
Ecological technological safety at business objects control system creation reasonability is noticed in complex aspect according to strategically ecological estimation. It allows to determine current environment state and planned activity potential influence upon population inside determined area.
Research object is technological safety at business objects ecological control system with dangerous environment influence prevention strategy.
Research subject is technological safety at business objects ecological control system development for petrol station as example.
References
1. Jurkiv, N. M., Didovych, I. I., & Kul'chyc'ka, E. A. (2021). Metodyka rozrahunku rivnja ekologichnoi' bezpeky eksportnoi' dijal'nosti lisogospodars'kyh pidpryjemstv [Methodology for calculating the level of environmental safety of export activities of forestry enterprises]. Naukovyj visnyk NLTU Ukrai'ny, 31(1), 62-67. DOI: 10.36930/40310110. [in Ukrainian]
2. Bauer-Simpson, K. (2020). What is the Difference Between Environmental Assessment and Environmental Impact Assessment? Focused Vision Consulting Pty Ltd. URL: https://www.focusedvision.com.au/what-is-the-difference-between-environmental-assessment-and-environmental-impact-assessment/.
3. USAID. (2022). Strategichna ekologichna ocinka kompleksnogo planu [Strategic environmental assessment of the comprehensive plan]. Kyiyv. URL: https://decentralization.ua/uploads/library/file/819/SEO_ready.pdf. [in Ukrainian]
4. Pro strategichnu ekologichnu ocinku [On strategic environmental assessment]. 2354-VIII Law of Ukraine. (2018). URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2354-19#Text. [in Ukrainian]
5. Partidário, M. R., & Sheate, W. (2017). High speed rail comparative strategic assessments in EU member states. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 66, 1-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2017.05.00.
6. Therivel, R., & Gonzalez, A. (2020). Is SEA worth it? Short-term costs v. long-term benefits of strategic environmental assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 83, 106411.
7. González, A. (2022). Strategic environmental assessment monitoring: the enduring forgotten sibling. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 40(2), 168-176. DOI: 10.1080/14615517.2022.2031552.
8. Del Campo González, A., Thérivel, R., & Malepe, K. (2021). Tiering of Environmental Assessment – the Influence of SEA on Project Level EIA. Ireland: Environmental Protection Agency. URL: https://www.epa.ie/publications/research/epa-research-2030-reports/Research_Report_391.pdf.
9. Gutierrez, M, Bekessy, S. A, & Gordon, A. (2021). Biodiversity and ecosystem services in strategic environmental assessment: an evaluation of six Australian cases. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 87, 106552. URL: DOI:10.1016/j.eiar.2021.106552.
10. Therivel, R, & González, A. (2021). “Ripe for decision”: tiering in Environmental Assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 87, 106520. DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2020.106520.
11. Fischer, T. B., & Retief, F. (2021). Does strategic environmental assessment lead to more environmentally sustainable decisions and action? Reflections on substantive effectiveness. Handbook on Strategic Environmental Assessment, 114-125.
12. Jurkiv, N. M. (2019). Metodyka ekologo-ekonomichnogo ocinjuvannja vyrobnychogo navantazhennja na lisovi ekosystemy v procesi zagotivli derevyny na eksport [ ]. Naukovyj visnyk NLTU Ukrai'ny. Serija ekonomichna, 29(4), 38-41. DOI: 10.15421/40290407. [in Ukrainian]
13. Rousseau, D. (2017). Systems Research and the Quest for Scientific Systems Principles. Systems, 5(2), 25. DOI: 10.3390/systems5020025.
14. Chai, Y. N., Wei, G. J., Hou, W., Feng, Z.-X., & Zhai, L. (2018). Multi-scale eco-environmental quality evaluation method from a spatial perspective. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 37(2), 596-604. DOI: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.201802.013.
15. Gao, B. J., & Chen, M. Y. (2018). A review of eco-environmental quality assessment. Hebei Journal of Forestry and Ecological Sciences, 33(1), 1-6. URL: https://caod.oriprobe.com/articles/53808742/A_review_of_eco_environmental_quality_assessment.htm.
16. Zhang, S., Yu, W., & Chen, T. (2021). Comprehensive Evaluation Model of Environmental Quality in Ecological Reserve. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 4994353. DOI: 10.1155/2021/4994353.
17. Kozulja, T. V. (2023). Koncepcija informacijno-entropijnogo prostoru pobudovy modelej systemnyh ob’jektiv dlja zadach stalogo rozvytku [The concept of the information-entropy space for building models of system objects for the tasks of sustainable development]. Radio Electronics, Computer Science, Control, 2(65), 20-31. DOI: 10.15588/1607-3274-2023-2-3. [in Ukrainian]
18. Chugaj, A. V., & Safranov, T. A. (2021). Metody ocinky tehnogennogo vplyvu na dovkillja [Methods of assessing technogenic impact on the environment]. Odesa: Vydavec' Bukajev Vadym Viktorovych. [in Ukrainian]
19. Chugaj, A. V. (2015). Ocinka vplyvu ekspluatacii' avtozapravnyh stancij na navkolyshnje pryrodne seredovyshhe [Assessment of the impact of gas station operation on the natural environment]. Visnyk Harkivs'kogo nacional'nogo avtomobil'no-dorozhn'ogo universytetu, 71, 97-102. URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/vhad_2015_71_17. [in Ukrainian]
20. Kozulja, T. V., & Korshunov, S. Je. (2023). Formuvannja informacijno-matematychnogo zabezpechennja ekologichnoi' ocinky dijal'nosti AZS [Formation of informational and mathematical support for environmental assessment of gas station activity]. Kompleksne vykorystannja resursiv dovkillja: zb. mater. I Vseukr. nauk.-prakt. konf. (Luc'k, 20 lystopada 2023 r.), 98-101. URL: https://donntu.edu.ua/main/i-vseukrayinska-naukovo-praktychna-konferentsiya-kompleksne-vykorystannya-resursiv-dovkillya.html. [in Ukrainian]
21. Pro ocinku vplyvu na dovkillja [On environmental impact assessment]. 2059-VIII Law of Ukraine. (2017). URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2059-19#Text. [in Ukrainian]
22. Pro zatverdzhennja metodychnyh rekomendacij “Ocinka ryzyku dlja zdorov'ja naselennja vid zabrudnennja atmosfernogo povitrja” [On the approval of methodological recommendations "Risk assessment for public health from atmospheric air pollution"]. 184 Order of Ministry of Health of Ukraine. (2007). URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/rada/show/v0184282-07#Text. [in Ukrainian]
23. Kozulja, T. V., & Korshunov, S. Je. (2023). Informacijno-programna pidtrymka kompleksnoi' ocinky tehnogenno-ekologichnoi' bezpeky na AZS na osnovi systemologichnogo pidhodu [Information and software support for the comprehensive evaluation of technogenic and ecological safety at gas stations based on a systemological approach]. Technogenic and Ecological Safety, 13(1/2023), 31-44. DOI: 10.52363/2522-1892.2023.1.5. [in Ukrainian]
24. Kozulja, T. V., & Korshunov, S. Je. (2023). Informacijne zabezpechennja rozv’jazku problemnyh zadach zahystu dovkillja pry roboti AZS [Information support for solving problematic problems of environmental protection during gas station operation]. Materialy P’jatoi' Vseukrai'ns'koi' naukovo-praktychnoi' konferencii' «Jevrointegracija ekologichnoi' polityky Ukrai'ny», 55–60. URL: http://eprints.library.odeku.edu.ua/id/eprint/12256. [in Ukrainian]
25. Kozulja, T. V., & Korshunov, S. Je. (2023). Rozrobka i zastosuvannja informacijno-programnogo zabezpechennja dlja operatyvnogo kompleksnogo ocinjuvannja rivnja ekobezpeky dijal'nosti AZS [Development and application of information and software for operational comprehensive assessment of the level of eco-safety of gas station operations]. ХVIІ Mizhnarodna naukovo-praktychna konferencija magistrantiv ta aspirantiv «Teoretychni ta praktychni doslidzhennja molodyh vchenyh», 136-137. URL: https://web.kpi.kharkov.ua/pbme/xvii-mizhnarodna-naukovo-praktychna-konferentsiya-magistrantiv-ta-aspirantiv-2023/. [in Ukrainian]