ASSESSMENT OF GROUNDWATER SAFETY USING A MULTI-MODEL WATER QUALITY INDEX AND HEALTH RISK INDICATORS
Bezsonnyi Vitalii
Simon Kuznets Kharkiv National University of Economics, Kharkiv, Ukraine
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8089-7724
Ponomarenko Roman
National University of Civil Protection of Ukraine, Cherkasy, Ukraine
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6300-3108
Plyatsuk Leonid
Sumy State University, Sumy, Ukraine
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0095-5846
Tretyakov Oleg
State University "Kyiv Aviation Institute", Kyiv, Ukraine
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9868-0486
DOI: 10.52363/2522-1892.2025.1.5
Keywords: groundwater, water quality index, WQI, HRWM, EWM, ISWM, toxicological assessment, health risk, water monitoring, weighting coefficients
Abstract
This article presents an approach to assessing the quality of groundwater based on a multi-model analysis of the Water Quality Index (WQI) using various weighting methods: expert-based (ISWM), entropy-based (EWM), and health risk-oriented (HRWM). The aim of the study is to identify the most sensitive and objective weighting method for groundwater quality assessment, considering the toxicological characteristics of pollutants and their potential health risks.
The methodology involves the normalization of hydrochemical indicators, the calculation of WQI for six wells located in the Izium district (Kharkiv region, Ukraine), and the estimation of risks according to the USEPA guidelines. In the HRWM model, reference doses (RfD) and cancer slope factors (CIC) are used to determine the weight of each pollutant in the overall index.
The results indicate that the HRWM approach is the most sensitive to toxic components (such as NO2–, Fe, Mn), able to identify risks even at concentrations below maximum permissible levels. The method effectively highlights priority pollution sources that require immediate environmental attention and monitoring.
Limitations of the study include the relatively small number of analyzed wells and the restricted list of parameters with available toxicological data, which may affect the comprehensiveness of assessment in broader applications.
The practical value of the approach lies in the ability to adapt the HRWM method for real-world groundwater monitoring, especially in regions with limited analytical or financial resources. It can also be incorporated into decision-making systems for drinking water quality management.
The scientific novelty of this research consists in the integrated use of three WQI weighting models within a single study, along with a comparative evaluation of their diagnostic effectiveness in identifying medically and environmentally relevant risks. The approach enhances the incorporation of biomedical criteria into traditional water quality assessment frameworks.
References
1. Sutadian, A. D., Muttil, N., Yilmaz, A. G., & Perera, B. J. C. (2016). Development of river water quality indices – a review. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 188(3), 5050. DOI: 10.1007/s10661-015-5050-0.
2. Zhang, Q., Xu, P., & Qian, H. (2020). Groundwater quality assessment using improved water quality index (WQI) and human health risk (HHR) evaluation in a semi-arid region of Northwest China. Exposure and Health, 12, 191–216. DOI: 10.1007/s12403-020-00345-w.
3. Pesce, S. F., & Wunderlin, D. A. (2000). Use of water quality indices to verify the impact of Córdoba City (Argentina) on Suquía River. Water Research, 34(11), 2915–2926. DOI: 10.1016/S0043-1354(00)00036-1.
4. Tavakoly Sany, S., Monazami Tehrani, G., Rezayi, M., Tajfard, M., & Borgheipour, H. (2018). Application of water quality indices for evaluating water quality and anthropogenic impact assessment. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 16, 1894–1906. DOI: 10.1007/s13762-018-1894-5.
5. Feng, Y., Yi, F., & Li, C. (2019). Improved entropy weighting model in water quality evaluation. Water Resources Management, 33, 4673–4689. DOI: 10.1007/s11269-019-02227-6.
6. Nisar, U. B., Rehman, W. U., Saleem, S., Taufail, K., Rehman, F. U., Farooq, M., & Ehsan, S. A. (2024). Assessment of water quality using entropy-weighted quality index, statistical methods and electrical resistivity tomography, Moti village, northern Pakistan. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 264, 104368. DOI: 10.1016/j.jconhyd.2024.104368.
7. Fanghui, Y., Chen, L., & Yan, F. (2018). The health risk weighting model in groundwater quality evaluation. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, 24(5), 1201–1215. DOI: 10.1080/10807039.2018.1488581.
8. Adimalla, N., & Wu, J. (2019). Groundwater quality and associated health risks in a semi-arid region of south India: Implication to sustainable groundwater management. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, 25(1–2), 191–216. DOI: 10.1080/10807039.2018.1546550.
9. Bretcan, P., Tanislav, D., Radulescu, C., Şerban, G., Danielescu, S., Reid, M., & Dunea, D. (2022). Evaluation of shallow groundwater quality at regional scales using adaptive water quality indices. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19, 10637. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191710637.
10. Nguyen, T., & Huynh, N. (2023). Characterization of groundwater quality and human health risk assessment. Civil Engineering Journal, 9(3), 618–628. DOI: 10.28991/CEJ-2023-09-03-09.
11. Krishan, G., Kumar, M., Rao, M. S., Garg, R., Yadav, B., Kansal, M., Singh, S., Bradley, A., Muste, M., & Sharma, L. (2023). Integrated approach for the investigation of groundwater quality through hydrochemistry and water quality index (WQI). Urban Climate, 47, 101383. DOI: 10.1016/j.uclim.2022.101383.
12. Badeenezhad, A., Tabatabaee, H., Nikbakht, H.-A., Radfard, M., Abbasnia, A., Baghapour, M., & Alhamd, M. (2020). Estimation of the groundwater quality index and investigation of the affecting factors their changes in Shiraz drinking groundwater, Iran. Groundwater for Sustainable Development, 11, 100435. DOI: 10.1016/j.gsd.2020.100435.
13. Bezsonnyi, V. L., Tretyakov, O. V., Plyatsuk, L. D., & Ponomarenko, R. V. (2024). Zastosuvannia pryntsypu maksymalnoi informatyvnosti pry minimalnii nadmirnosti informatsii dlia vyboru optymalnoho chysla parametriv yakosti vody [Application of the principle of maximum informativeness with minimum redundancy of information to determine the optimal number of water quality parameters]. Technogenic and Ecological Safety, 15(1), 46–53. DOI: 10.52363/2522-1892.2024.1.4. [in Ukrainian]
14. Bezsonnyi, V. L., Plyatsuk, L. D., Ponomarenko, R. V., & Tretyakov, O. V. (2022). Otsinka tekhnohenno-ekolohichnoi bezpeky vodotoku za pokaznykamy ryzyku v umovakh voiennoi nebezpeky [Assessment of technogenic and ecological safety of a watercourse using risk indicators under war danger]. Technogenic and Ecological Safety, 12(2), 72–79. DOI: 10.52363/2522-1892.2022.2.9. [in Ukrainian]
15. Bezsonnyi, V. L. (2022). Vybir indykatyvnoho pokaznyka ekolohichnoho stanu poverkhnevoho dzherela vodopostachannia [Selection of an indicative indicator of the ecological state of a surface water supply source]. Municipal Economy of Cities, 3(170), 26–34. DOI: 10.33042/2522-1809-2022-3-170-26-34. [in Ukrainian]
16. Bezsonnyi, V. L., Plyatsuk, L. D., & Tretyakov, O. V. (2022). Zasoby matematychnoho prohnozuvannia otsinky ekolohichnoho stanu poverkhnevykh vodnykh obiektiv [Mathematical forecasting tools for assessing the ecological state of surface water bodies]. Ecological Sciences, 5(44), 64–68. DOI: 10.32846/2306-9716/2022.eco.5-44.9. [in Ukrainian]
17. Bezsonnyi, V. L., Plyatsuk, L. D., Ponomarenko, R. V., & Tretyakov, O. V. (2023). Vyznachennia ekolohichnoho stanu Kremenchutskoho vodoskhovyshcha na osnovi informatsiinoi entropii [Determination of the ecological state of the Kremenchuk Reservoir based on informational entropy]. Technogenic and Ecological Safety, 13(1), 20–26. DOI: 10.52363/2522-1892.2023.1.3. [in Ukrainian]
18. United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2021). Risk assessment guidance for superfund (RAGS), Volume I: Human health evaluation manual (Part A). URL: https://www.epa.gov/risk/risk-assessment-guidance-superfund-rags-part.
19. Khan, S., Shahnaz, M., Jehan, N., Rehman, S., Shah, M., & Din, I. (2013). Drinking water quality and human health risk in Charsadda district, Pakistan. Journal of Cleaner Production, 60, 93–101. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.02.016.
20. Weber, G., & Kubiniok, J. (2022). Spring waters as an indicator of nitrate and pesticide pollution of rural watercourses from nonpoint sources: Results of repeated monitoring campaigns since the early 2000s in the low mountain landscape of Saarland, Germany. Environmental Sciences Europe, 34, 53. DOI: 10.1186/s12302-022-00632-0.
21. Singh, K. P., Basant, A., Malik, A., & Jain, G. (2009). Artificial neural network modeling of the river water quality – A case study. Ecological Modelling, 220, 888–895. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2009.01.004.