CO2 EMISSIONS FROM BIOLOGICAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITIES OPERATING UNDER THE AO SCHEME
Iurchenko Valentyna
O. M. Beketov National University of Urban Economy, Kharkiv, Ukraine
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7123-710X
Avdiienko Iryna
O. M. Beketov National University of Urban Economy, Kharkiv, Ukraine
https://orcid.org/0009-0008-4140-1923
Khrystenko Artur
Stadtentwässerung Calw, Calw, Federal Republic of Germany
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7821-8788
DOI: 10.52363/2522-1892.2025.1.10
Key words: biological wastewater treatment, greenhouse gas emissions, carbon dioxide, emission measurement, aeration tank, denitrification tank, dissolved oxygen
Abstract
The biological treatment of municipal wastewater is an essential component of modern environmental protection strategies, significantly reducing the anthropogenic load on natural water ecosystems. However, this process is associated with substantial emissions of greenhouse gases, particularly CO2, N2O, and CH4, which contribute to global climate change. Despite the recognized high warming potential of nitrous oxide and methane, carbon dioxide remains the most voluminous greenhouse gas released during biological wastewater treatment. Yet, due to its biogenic origin, these emissions are often underestimated or excluded from national and global inventories, potentially distorting the actual impact of urban wastewater treatment plants on the climate system.
This study focuses on the quantitative assessment of carbon dioxide emissions generated during the aerobic treatment of municipal wastewater at a full-scale treatment facility operating under the anoxic-oxic scheme. The research aims to determine the locations and stages within the technological process that are characterized by the highest intensity of carbon dioxide emissions, thereby contributing to the identification of emission hotspots and the development of climate-conscious technological improvements.
Experimental measurements were carried out at a treatment plant in Germany with varying daily inflow capacities during two separate observation periods. Using high-precision analytical equipment, the concentration of carbon dioxide and oxygen in the air above the wastewater surface was measured across multiple treatment stages. Complementary physicochemical and hydrochemical analyses of the wastewater were performed to determine the oxygen content and degradation intensity of organic pollutants throughout the system.
The results revealed a distinct correlation between the oxygen concentration in treated wastewater and the level of carbon dioxide emissions at various stages. The highest levels of carbon dioxide were recorded in zones where biological oxidation was most intense, particularly in the aeration tanks. In contrast, areas with limited aeration or anaerobic conditions exhibited lower emission levels.
References
1. Bani Shahabadi, M., Yerushalmi, L., & Haghighat, F. (2009). Impact of process design on greenhouse gas (GHG) generation by wastewater treatment plants. Water Research, 43(10), 2679–2687. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2009.03.016.
2. Larsen, T. A. (2015). CO2-neutral wastewater treatment plants or robust, climate-friendly wastewater management? A systems perspective. Water Research, 87, 513–521. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2015.09.011.
3. Sweetapple, C., Fu, G., & Butler, D. (2014). Identifying sensitive sources and key control handles for the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions from wastewater treatment. Water Research, 62, 249–259. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2014.05.028.
4. Nguyen, T. K. L., Ngo, H. H., Guo, W., Chang, S. W., Nguyen, D. D., & Nghiem, L. D. (2019). Insight into greenhouse gases emissions from the two popular treatment technologies in municipal wastewater treatment processes. Science of the Total Environment, 1302, 1–8. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.1302.
5. Qiu, Y., Ekström, S., Valverde-Pérez, B., Smets, B. F., Climent, J., Domingo-Féliz, C., Martínez Cuenca, R., & Plósz, B. G. (2024). Numerical modelling of surface aeration and N2O emission in biological water resource recovery. Water Research, 255, 121398. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2024.121398.
6. Kucheriuk, P. P., Matveiev, Y. B., Shlykhta, V. M., Mozharovska, E. A., & Zakharchuk, Y. V. (2013). Inventaryzatsiia parnykovykh haziv pry obrobtsi promyslovykh stichnykh vod v Ukraini [Inventory of greenhouse gases during the treatment of industrial wastewater in Ukraine]. Ecological Sciences, 4, 50–58. [in Ukrainian]
7. Smith, J., Johnson, L., & Brown, M. (2023). Carbon dioxide emissions from wastewater treatment plants: Aerobic processes and organic matter mineralization. Environmental Science Journal, 45(3), 112–125. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2023.01.004.
8. IPCC. (2019). Refinement to the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories.
9. Wang, X. (2020). Energy consumption, chemical use and carbon footprints of wastewater treatment alternatives: Assessment methodology and sustainability solutions. Springer Singapore. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-13-5983-5.
10. Wang, D., Ye, W., Wu, G., Li, R., Guan, Y., Zhang, W., Wang, J., Shan, Y., & Hubacek, K. (2022). Greenhouse gas emissions from municipal wastewater treatment facilities in China from 2006 to 2019. Scientific Data, 9, 317. DOI: 10.1038/s41597-022-01174-w.
11. Ukraine’s Greenhouse Gas Inventory 1990–2022. Annual National Inventory Report for Submission under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and the Kyoto Protocol 2024. (2024). URL: https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/resource/Ukraine_NIR_2024.pdf.
12. Kumar, M., & Dutta, A. (2019). Greenhouse gas emissions from wastewater treatment plants: A review. Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(10), 1839. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16101839.
13. Wu, G., & Zhang, Z. (2021). Identifying fossil origins of CO2 emissions in biological processes. Environmental Science and Technology, 55(12), 7113–7123. DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.1c00544.
14. IPCC. (2019). 2019 Refinement to the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories.Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.