THE IMPACT OF MILITARY ACTIONS ON UNIQUE NATURAL OBJECTS OF KHARKIV REGION - Науково-технічний журнал «Техногенно-екологічна безпека»

This article explores the impact of military actions on unique natural objects in the Kharkiv region. A comprehensive analysis of the consequences of armed conflicts on the natural environment and nature reserves of the region has been conducted. In particular, aspects such as loss of biodiversity, pollution of water resources, and damage to ecosystems are examined. The article also discusses possible measures for the restoration and preservation of natural objects after military events, aimed at restoring ecological balance and ensuring the stability of natural ecosystems in the region. Risk calculations for public health due to soil pollution after a forest fire in the "FELDMAN ECO-PARK" show that the risk corresponds to Class 4 for mobile forms and gross content of pollutants (significant impact, severe acute effects). The use of a methodological approach to assess potential health risks allows determining the level of danger of recreational activities in the eco-park, identifying priorities for the implementation of nature conservation measures.

Conducting such research will help identify effective ways of restoring and preserving natural ecosystems in the area affected by Russian aggression, ensuring their sustainable functioning in the future. The restoration of the eco-park is not only about designing and building new enclosures and playgrounds. It is also about restoring the ecosystem, a unique nature reserve for preserving biodiversity and rare species of animals and plants.

According to various estimates, complete cleaning of forests and other areas from explosive remnants of war may take from one to several decades after the end of hostilities. Therefore, it is crucial for the international community to take responsibility for protecting nature and the environment during armed conflicts and contribute to its further development. The Protocol to the Geneva Conventions calls for protecting nature from war damage, representing a significant direction in international law recognized by many countries worldwide.

References

1. Cardinale, B. J., Duffy, J. E., Gonzalez, A., Hooper, D. U., Perrings, C., Venail, P., Narwani, A., Mace, G. M., Tilman, D., Wardle, D. A., Kinzig, A. P., Daily, G. C., Loreau, M., Grace, J. B., Larigauderie, A,, Srivastava, D. S., & Naeem, S. (2012). Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity. Nature, 486(7401), 59-67. URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/nature11148.

2. Ceballos, G., Ehrlich, P. R., & Dirzo, R. (2017). Biological annihilation via the ongoing sixth mass extinction signaled by vertebrate population losses and declines. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(30), E6089-E6096. URL: https://www.pnas.org/content/114/30/E6089.

3. Angurets, O., Khazan, P., Kolesnikova, K., Kushch, M., Černochova, M., & Havránek, M. (2023). Ukraine, damage to the environment, environmental consequences of war. NGO “Green World – Friends of the Earth” (Ukraine) in collaboration with the NGO “Arnika”.

4. Grima, N., & Singh, S. J. (2019). How the end of armed conflicts influence forest cover and subsequently ecosystem services provision? An analysis of four case studies in biodiversity hotspots. Land Use Policy, 81, 267-275. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.10.056.

5. Duffy, J. E., Godwin, C.M., & Cardinale, B. J. (2017). Biodiversity effects in the wild are common and as strong as key drivers of productivity. Nature, 549(7671), 261-264. URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/nature23886.

6. Beattie, M., Fa, E. J., Leiper, I., Fernández-Llamazares, Á., Zander, K. K., & Garnett, S.T. (2023) Even after armed conflict, the environmental quality of Indigenous Peoples' lands in biodiversity hotspots surpasses that of non-Indigenous lands. Biological Conservation, 286, 110288. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2023.110288.

7. Zhang, Z., Ding, J., Zhao, W., Liu, Y., & Pereira, P. (2023). The impact of the armed conflict in Afghanistan on vegetation dynamics. Science of The Total Environment, 856(2), 159138. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159138.

8. Cochard, R. (2017). Scaling the Costs of Natural Ecosystem Degradation and Biodiversity Losses in Aceh Province, Sumatra. Redefining Diversity & Dynamics of Natural Resources Management in Asia, 1, 231-271. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-805454-3.00013-X.

9. Mhanna, S., Halloran, L. J. S., Zwahlen, F., Asaad, A. H., & Brunner, P. (2023). Using machine learning and remote sensing to track land use/land cover changes due to armed conflict. Science of The Total Environment, 898, 165600. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165600.

10. Gorsevski, V., Kasischke, E., Dempewolf, J., Loboda, T., & Grossmann, F. (2012). Analysis of the Impacts of armed conflict on the Eastern Afromontane forest region on the South Sudan – Uganda border using multitemporal Landsat imagery. Remote Sensing of Environment, 118, 10-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2011.10.023.

11. Aung, T. S. (2021). Satellite analysis of the environmental impacts of armed-conflict in Rakhine, Myanmar. Science of The Total Environment, 781, 146758. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146758.

12. Pereira, P., Bašić, F., & Barcelo, D. (2022). Russian-Ukrainian war impacts the total environment. Science of The Total Environment, 837, 155865. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155865.

13. Solokha, M., Pereira, P., Symochko, L., Vynokurova, N., Demyanyuk, O., Sementsova, K., Inacio, M., & Barcelo, D. (2023). Russian-Ukrainian war impacts on the environment. Evidence from the field on soil properties and remote sensing. Science of The Total Environment, 902, 166122. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166122.

14. Chowdhury, P. R., Medhi, H., Bhattacharyya, K. G., & Hussain, C. M. (2023). Severe deterioration in food-energy-ecosystem nexus due to ongoing Russia-Ukraine war: A critical review. Science of The Total Environment, 902, 166131. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.16613.

15. Zvit pro prjami zbytky infrastruktury vid rujnuvan' vnaslidok vijs'kovoi' agresii' rosii' proty Ukrai'ny za rik vid pochatku povnomasshtabnogo vtorgnennja [Report on the direct damage to the infrastructure from the destruction caused by Russia's military aggression against Ukraine one year after the start of the full-scale invasion]. (2023). Kyiyv. URL: https://kse.ua/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/UKR_Feb23_FINAL_Damages-Report-1.pdf. [in Ukrainian]

16. Rybalova, O. V., Brygada, O. V., Korobkina, K. M., Krajnjukov, O. M., & Miroshnychenko, I. M. (2019). Vyznachennja nebezpeky vplyvu lisovyh pozhezh na jakisnyj stan g'runtiv [Determination of the danger of the impact of forest fires on the quality of soils]. Scientific bulletin of construction, 2(96)-2, 413-422. URL: http://repositsc.nuczu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/9429. [in Ukrainian]

17. Rybalova, O. V., Brygada, O. V., Sarapina, M. V., & Korobkina, K. M. (2020). Zabrudnennja g'runtiv vnaslidok lisovyh pozhezh [Soil pollution due to forest fires]. The 6 th International scientific and practical conference “Perspectives of world science and education” (February 26-28, 2020). CPN Publishing Group, Osaka, Japan, 711-718. URL: http://repositsc.nuczu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/10611. [in Ukrainian]

18. Department of Ecology and Natural Resources of the Kharkiv Regional State Administration. (2020). Ekologichnyj pasport regionu. Harkivs'ka oblast' [Ecological passport of the region. Kharkiv region]. [in Ukrainian]

19. Department of Ecology and Natural Resources of the Kharkiv Regional State Administration. (2020). Dopovid' pro stan navkolyshn'ogo pryrodnogo seredovyshha v Harkivs'kij oblasti u 2019 roci [Report on the state of the natural environment in the Kharkiv region in 2019]. [in Ukrainian]

20. Rybalova, O. V., Kochura, A. S., & Jarmola, V. A. (2023). Vplyv bojovyh dij na unikal'ni pryrodni ob’jekty Ukrai'ny [The impact of hostilities on unique natural objects of Ukraine]. The XIV International Scientific and Practical Conference «Prospects for the development of science and the environment», April 10 – 12, Helsinki, Finland, 88-94. [in Ukrainian]

21. Molina, J. R., González-Cabán, A., & Silva, F. R. (2019). Wildfires impact on the economic susceptibility of recreation activities: Application in a Mediterranean protected area. Journal of Environmental Management, 1, 454-463.

22. Zibcev, S. V., Soshens'kyj, O. M., Goldammer, J. G., Myronjuk, V. V., Borsuk, O. A., Gumenjuk, V. V., Mjeshkova, V. L., Vasyljuk, O. V., & Buksha, I. F. (2022). Lisoupravlinnja na terytorijah, zabrudnenyh vybuhonebezpechnymy predmetamy [Forest management in territories contaminated by explosive objects]. WWF-Ukraine. [in Ukrainian]

23. Main website of GO “Feldman Ecopark”. URL: https://feldman-ecopark.com/.

24. Vasenko, O. G., Rybalova, O. V., Artemʹjev, S. R., Gorban', N. S., Korobkova, G. V., Polozencjeva, V. O., Kozlovs'ka, O. V., Macak, A. O. & Savichjev, A. A. (2015). Integral'ni ta kompleksni ocinky stanu navkolyshn'ogo pryrodnogo seredovyshha: monografija [Integral and complex assessments of the state of the natural environment: monograph]. Kharkiv, NUGZU. [in Ukrainian]

25. Rybalova, O., Artemiev, S., Sarapina, M., Tsymbal, B., Bakharevа, A., Shestopalov, O., & Filenko, O. (2018). Development of methods for estimating the environmental risk of degradation of the surface water state. EasternEuropean Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 2/10(92), 4-17. DOI: 10.15587/1729-4061.2018.127829.

26. Rybalova, O. V., Brygada, O. V.,Bondarenko, O. O., & Makarov , Je. O. (2019). Novyj metod ocinky ryzyku dlja zdorov’ja naselennja vid zabrudnennja g'runtiv vazhkymy metalamy [A new method of assessing the risk to public health from soil contamination with heavy metals]. Problems of emergency situations, 1(29), 79-99. [in Ukrainian]

27. U.S. EPA. (2007). Method 3051A: Microwave Assisted Acid Digestion of Sediments, Sludges, and Oils. URL: https://www.epa.gov/esam/us-epa-method-3051a-microwave-assisted-acid-digestion-sediments-sludges-and-oils.